Share your Safety Practices Awards Best Practices
Download the ESRD Patient Annotated Bibliography
Patient Safety Improvement Toolkit
Spotlight on safety
Renal Patient Safety Resources
Did you know
Non Adherence to Procedures Did You Know?
>
Non Adherence to Procedures

Download a PDF of this page

- Incorrect Dialyzer or Dialyzing Solution - Non-Adherence to Procedures
- Patient Falls - Hand Hygiene
- Medication Errors    
FACT
SOURCE
Nonadherence (based on "missed dialysis" treatments as the main outcome measure) was much more common in the United States compared with Sweden and Japan. Skipping and shortening hemodialysis treatments is much more common in the United States than in Euro-Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) or Japan. Nonadherence, as measured by skipping and shortening hemodialysis treatments, was more prevalent in the United States than in Euro-DOPPS and Japan.
R. Saran et al., "Nonadherence in Hemodialysis: Associations With Mortality, Hospitalization, and Practice Patterns in the DOPPS," Kidney International 64 (2003): 254-262, http://www.nature.com/ki/journal/v64/n1/full/4493867a.html (accessed July 9, 2008).

Patients that are younger age, African American, female, disabled, living alone, smokers, and/or depressed, and those with extended time as ESRD were associated with higher odds of nonadherence with one or more of the measurements of nonadherence. Some college education and prior kidney transplant were associated with neutral odds of nonadherence in all the domains studied.
R. Saran et al., "Nonadherence in Hemodialysis: Associations With Mortality, Hospitalization, and Practice Patterns in the DOPPS," Kidney International 64 (2003): 254-262, http://www.nature.com/ki/journal/v64/n1/full/4493867a.html (accessed July 9, 2008).

Living in a nursing home was associated with 47% lower odds of skipping treatment, perhaps owing to staff supervision and predictable transportation arrangements to and from the dialysis unit.
R. Saran et al., "Nonadherence in Hemodialysis: Associations With Mortality, Hospitalization, and Practice Patterns in the DOPPS," Kidney International 64 (2003): 254-262, http://www.nature.com/ki/journal/v64/n1/full/4493867a.html (accessed July 9, 2008).

Facilities with more than 60 patients had a significantly higher odds ratio of skipping dialysis (1.77, P = 0.001) and those with more than 75 patients had a significantly higher odds ratio of shortening dialysis (1.57, P = 0.006). It was only when facility size exceeded 125 patients that a significantly higher odds ratio was detected for interdialytic weight gain. Larger facilities were more likely to encounter a higher level of nonadherence, especially with respect to skipping and shortening dialysis.
R. Saran et al., "Nonadherence in Hemodialysis: Associations With Mortality, Hospitalization, and Practice Patterns in the DOPPS," Kidney International 64 (2003): 254-262, http://www.nature.com/ki/journal/v64/n1/full/4493867a.html (accessed July 9, 2008).

Both the percentage of highly trained staff hours and of highly trained staff members in a facility seem to have an effect on patient nonadherence, as measured by skipping in a given facility. This result was statistically significant (odds ratio = 0.84 for 10% more highly trained staff, P = 0.02) and points to the possible negative effect of hiring less than highly trained staff in dialysis units, a trend more commonly observed in the United States. Highly trained staff may help to decrease nonadherence.
R. Saran et al., "Nonadherence in Hemodialysis: Associations With Mortality, Hospitalization, and Practice Patterns in the DOPPS," Kidney International 64 (2003): 254-262, http://www.nature.com/ki/journal/v64/n1/full/4493867a.html (accessed July 9, 2008).

Patients with renal disease are at increased risk of acquiring hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection because of their frequent exposure to blood from transfusions or exposure to HCV-contaminated medical equipment during hemodialysis. The prevalence of anti-HCV antibodies among hemodialysis patients varies between 5-10% in the developed world.
Sikole A, Dzekova P, Asani A, Amitov V, Selim G, Gelev S, Polenakovic M. New approaches in the therapy of hepatitis C in dialysis patients. Prilozi. 2009 Dec;29(2):155-66.

Venous needle dislodgements can result in patients losing more than 40 percent of their blood volume in just 5-7 minutes.
Hurst J A. Venous Needle Dislodgement. Renal Business Today. Sept 9, 2009.
http://www.renalbusiness.com/articles/venous-needle-dislodgement.html (accessed Sept 23, 2009)
-